Literaturverzeichnis — MA 105 UdK Berlin

Monographien & Sammelbände

Amlinger, C. & Nachtwey, O. (2023). Einleitung. In C. Amlinger & O. Nachtwey (Hrsg.), Gekränkte Freiheit: Aspekte des libertären Autoritarismus (1. Aufl., S. 9–25). Suhrkamp. Art. 03
Rhein, R. (Hrsg.). (2024). Wissenschaftsdidaktik IV: Wissenschaftskommunikation. transcript. Art. 01
Ziegler, R. (Hrsg.). (2023). Evaluationsmethoden der Wissenschaftskommunikation. Springer. Art. 01

Amon, J. J. (2025). Science censorship and the erosion of public trust. The Lancet, 405, 83–85. Art. 04, 05
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Art. 06
Henning, T. (2025). Wissenschaftsfreiheit, moralische Kritik und die Kosten des Irrtums. Erkenntnis, 90(3), 799–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00715-1 Art. 02, 03
Misselbrook, D. (2018). Duty, Kant, and deontology. British Journal of General Practice, 68(671), 303. Art. 04
Neuhäuser, C. (2023). Meinungsfreiheit und Moralismus. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 71(4), 510–537. https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2023-0041 Art. 02
Phan-Warnke, L. & von Strasser, J. (2023). Academic freedom and censorship in the United States. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 61(2), 1–32. Art. 04
Scheufele, D. A. (2014). Science communication as political communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl. 4), 13585–13592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111 Art. 06
Weingart, P., Joubert, M. & Connoway, K. (2018). Public engagement with science and technology. In Perspektiven der Wissenschaftskommunikation im digitalen Zeitalter. acatech / Leopoldina. Art. 06

Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., 570 U.S. 205 (2013). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/570/205/ Art. 05
Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/372/58/ Art. 04
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/478/675/ Art. 05
Butler v. Michigan, 352 U.S. 380 (1957). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/352/380/ Art. 05
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/268/652/ Art. 04, 05
Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/283/697/ Art. 04
Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (1959). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/361/147/ Art. 04
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/234/ Art. 05

American Civil Liberties Union. (2024). ACLU statement on Supreme Court’s decision related to whether public officials can block social media followers. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-statement Art. 05
American Library Association. (2021). What is censorship? https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/censorship Art. 04
Killion, V. L. (2024). Freedom of speech: An overview (Report R47986). Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986 Art. 04
U.S. National Archives. (o. D.). Bill of Rights (First Amendment). https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript Art. 04

Barnhart, M. (2025, Juli). NIH director Bhattacharya denies banned word list in meeting with staffers. Chemical & Engineering News. https://cen.acs.org/policy/research-funding/NIH-director-Bhattacharya-denies-banned Art. 05
Heinig, H. (2025). Harvard under attack. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/academic-freedom-united-states/ Art. 05
Oza, A. (2025, 29. Oktober). Scientists had to change more than 700 grant titles to receive NIH funding. STAT News. https://www.statnews.com/2025/10/29/nih-banned-words-analysis Art. 05
Raymond, N. (2025, 5. März). US judge bars Trump administration from cutting NIH research funding. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com Art. 04, 05
Raymond, N. (2025, 2. April). Researchers, ACLU sue over Trump’s “ideological purge” of NIH grants. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com Art. 05
The Associated Press. (2025). Scientists sue NIH, saying politics cut their research funding. AP News. https://apnews.com Art. 05
The Guardian. (2025, 16. Juni). Trump officials cutting $1bn in NIH grants is “void and illegal,” judge rules. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com Art. 04, 05
Vertuno, J. (2025). Supreme Court declines to hear Texas book ban appeal. AP News. https://apnews.com Art. 05